$68.4M

Total Estimated Trial Cost

$111,383
Cost per Patient
$4,843
Cost per Visit
$1.4M
Monthly Cost
$75
Cost per Patient-Day
614
Total Patients
$3,832
CRO Cost per Visit

Cost Breakdown

CRO & Patient Treatment Costs $54.1M
Study Drug Costs $0.7M
Comparator Costs $0.0M
Sponsor Overhead (25%) $13.5M
Total Estimated Cost $68.4M

Detailed Analysis Results

Visit Schedule Analysis
23 visits per patient

Most granular public information comes from the ClinicalTrials.gov record plus two hospital recruitment pages that outline patient-facing logistics.
All sources agree the first 21-day dose-escalation (“DLT”) cycle requires intensive pharmacokinetic and safety monitoring with clinic visits on Days 1, 2, 8 and 15, in addition to a pre-study screening visit and an end-of-cycle evaluation.
For patients who continue beyond Cycle 1, both the protocol synopsis on the sponsor site and hospital listings state that clinic assessments occur on Day 1 of every subsequent 21-day cycle, with imaging every two cycles; expansion-phase subjects are expected to remain on treatment ~12 months unless they progress earlier.
Using these details we estimate 5-7 scheduled visits in the initial Dose-Exploration phase and 15-19 visits over 12 expansion cycles, giving mid-point estimates of 6 and 17 respectively.
No tele-health–only visits are mentioned; all listed encounters are assumed in-person.

Protocol Complexity Assessment
Medium complexity protocol

Narrative summary
RMC-6236-001 is an open-label Phase 1/1b first-in-human oncology trial evaluating an oral RAS-MULTI(ON) inhibitor in adults with advanced solid tumours carrying specific RAS mutations. According to the ClinicalTrials.gov record and a 2Q-2024 Revolution Medicines corporate deck, the study:

• uses a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation followed by multiple parallel expansion cohorts;
• plans ~614 participants but currently lists 16 U.S. academic / high-throughput cancer centres only; no ex-US countries have been opened to date;
• requires frequent safety labs, intensive plasma PK profiling through Week 15, and CT/MRI tumour assessments every 8 weeks through treatment and for 30 days after the last dose; no mandatory fresh tumour biopsies are specified;
• has an overall treatment plus follow-up window of ≈2.5 years (long for Phase 1 oncology);
• mandates documented KRAS/NRAS/HRAS mutations, adding moderate screening complexity.

Cost-driver comparison vs. typical Phase 1 solid-tumour trials (usually ≤10 sites, 12-18 month duration, similar PK and imaging schedules) therefore shows:

Complex procedures – comparable (routine blood PK, imaging);
Sites/Countries – modest number and single-country footprint;
Study duration – somewhat longer than norm;
Monitoring & data demands – standard for oncology.

Overall, operational cost is estimated MEDIUM within Phase 1 Oncology.

Estimated scheduled on-site visits per patient
• Screening (1)
• Cycle 1 weekly visits Days 1, 8, 15, 22 (4)
• Cycle 2 Days 1 & 15 (2)
• Cycles 3-6 Day 1 every 28 days (4)
• Imaging/End-of-Tx ~q8w overlaps with Day 1 visits
• Safety follow-up 30 days post last dose (1)
≈12 in-person visits during the first 24 weeks; patients continuing beyond 6 cycles would add monthly visits.

Study Drug Cost Analysis
$0.7M total study drug costs

Analysis
Key cost-driver assumptions
• Dose & regimen: Final recommended phase-2 dose expected at ~150 mg orally once daily. Tablets manufactured at 50 mg strength; average patient takes 3 tablets/day.
• Treatment duration: Median on-treatment exposure in phase-1/1b oncology trials ≈ 4 months (120 days).
• Enrollment: 614 evaluable patients.
• Overage: 25 % added to cover screen failures, early discontinuations, shipping losses, and expiry.
• Total API required = 150 mg × 120 days × 614 pts × 1.25 overage = 16.6 kg.
• API cost: First-generation GMP route for a synthetically complex, small-molecule RAS inhibitor budgeted at USD 20,000/kg (mid-range of USD 15k–30k/kg typical for low-tens-kg scale). API cost ≈ 20,000 × 16.6 kg = USD 332 k.
• Formulation: Direct compression into film-coated 50 mg tablets; 30 tablet HDPE bottles. Total tablets = 3 tabs/day × 120 days × 614 pts × 1.25 = 276,000. Small-scale CMO price (tableting, coating, in-process controls) budgeted at USD 0.30/tab → USD 83 k.
• Packaging/labeling: 30-count bottles; 276,000 ÷ 30 = 9,200 bottles, each USD 2.00 (printed label, booklet leaflet, tamper-evident seal) → USD 18 k.
• Release & stability testing: Five GMP batches anticipated; USD 15 k/batch analytical release + USD 5 k/batch stability initiation → USD 100 k total.
• Depot storage & distribution: Ambient product; global 3PL depot at USD 2 k/mo for 48 months = USD 96 k. Site resupply logistics: ~240 temperature-monitored shipments at USD 200 each = USD 48 k.
• Project management / QP release / regulatory documentation: 10 % of direct CMC spend = USD 68 k.

Cost build-up (USD, rounded):
API 332 k
Tableting 83 k
Packaging/labeling 18 k
Analytical & stability 100 k
Depot storage 96 k
Distribution 48 k
CMC PM/QP 68 k
Expected total ≈ 745 k.

Range:
Low case (75 mg RP2D, 15 k/kg API, shorter 3-month median exposure) ≈ 380 k.
High case (300 mg RP2D, 30 k/kg API, 6-month median exposure, extra stability lots) ≈ 1.5 M.

Comparator Cost Analysis
No comparator costs (single-arm study)

This Phase 1/1b study is single-arm and open-label: every enrolled patient receives the investigational agent RMC-6236, with no active control, placebo, or sham procedure specified. Because no comparator product needs to be procured, packaged, blinded, stored, or shipped, the entire comparator-supply budget is zero.

Therapeutic Area Analysis
Classified as oncology

Based on the analysis, this study falls under oncology therapeutic area.

Cost Analysis Methodology
Moore 2020 methodology with therapeutic area adjustments

This tool estimates clinical trial costs using established academic methodologies and real-world data sources:

1. Initial Search

Check for any company-disclosed trial costs via web search

2. Core Model

Apply Moore 2020 methodology using two key cost drivers:

  • Number of patients (from clinicaltrials.gov)
  • Visits per patient (estimated via protocol review)
  • Values are input into the statistical model developed in the paper for estimating trial costs (R sq = 0.7, F=257.9, p<0.01)
3. Adjustments
  • Protocol complexity multiplier (high/medium/low assessment)
    • Multiplier calculated by IQR of cost/patient / median cost/patient; low multiplier uses 25% quartile, high uses 75%
    • Applies 50% shrinkage factor because some of trial complexity can be explained by visits / patient
  • Phase and therapeutic area multipliers (Moore 2020, Sertkaya 2016 data)
    • Moore only estimates pivotal trial costs
    • To get Phase 1 or 2 trial costs, we apply a phase multipler using Phase X/Phase 3 cost ratio from Sertkaya
    • Therapeutic area multiplier based on average cost/patient for target therapeutic area / average cost/patient for all therapeutic areas from Sertkaya
  • Inflation adjustment to May 2025 dollars
  • Applies 2.5x CRO cost multiplier for rare diseases per Jayasundara 2019
4. Additional Costs

Add 25% overhead plus estimated study drug and comparator costs

Accuracy: The methodology typically estimates within 60-160% of actual costs and provides a systematic approach for investment analysis and business planning.

Geographic Cost Analysis

Coming Soon

Analysis of cost variations by geographic region and site selection impact.

Comparable Trials

Coming Soon

Benchmarking against similar trials in the same therapeutic area and phase.

Interactive Calculator

$68.4M

Updated Cost Estimate

Quick Breakdown
CRO Costs $54.1M
Study Drug Costs $0.7M
Comparator Costs $0.0M
Overhead $13.5M
Total $68.4M
Interactive Calculator

Subscribe to access the interactive calculator and run unlimited cost analyses on your own trials.

Data Quality

Complete: Patient enrollment data
Complete: Visit schedule analysis
Estimated: Geographic distribution assumed
Estimated: Screening costs not specified